Who am I?
I really started at the beginning of my teenager on stone which my father had brought back of a stone mason, a stock which was there, in the middle of the farmyard. It was the summer and the trouble gained me as I had horror to twice remake the same thing a new experiment was profiled, I took a block of stone, a hammer, a graver, and here me is party in a corner of the farm to type, cut down, format. In the birth rose from one of the first small princesses. It was not really my first creation but this one, I had done it in the stone and was going to last for an eternity. The idea of eternity allured me. I always had a very marked preference for modelling before this first sculpture. The modelling of the ground attracted me and with by front, I carried out some works now destroyed by time, which touches me sentimentally. The discovery of the sculpture in a durable material fascinated me. To fill the lack of means of the development of work on the ground by cooking in a furnace what makes the ground durable. The size of the stone enabled me to forget the transitory character of the sculpture on ground. On these first experiments started a road of training for generally self-educated, although the visit of an exposure influences me and learns to me a more or less close step, more or less foreign. After followed wood, metal, resin… and the techinques ones which goes with… The training of the implementation is carried out atraction the subject attracts me, I do not know nothing there, I go started with what I know already, it me repouse by my méaventure, I study my erreures compléte my gesture, thus the expreior of the subject this creates the maitriser without. The maitrise it is not me which decides if I have it or not, one forever it is to it my opinion. One approaches some. There is all my facination for the representational art. You know! It is easy to speak, less this to make entredre and even more complicated to be crompris. My step also goes to me close to the people, of people, for personal spirits and discussions in group. I allows itself to propose it is concept which is rather interesting, during my maintenance of recruitings which many I are had to often employ one or the other terms “the people” and “people”. Then according to certain criterion of the company one or the other is better to appreciate. Nobody and generally, why? We live in a capitalist company, based on the rights of the person, or publicity is addressed personally at you in your living room. or we make you a personalized credit. This topic which put to you easily at ease is very hard, it speaks nevertheless about the certain selfishness, because one this directs quickly in a step personnel of consumption. Or the excess of each one, accumulates the drift of a community. That if people are spoken, of a team, there is division, there are communication and training of the other, of the spirits of each one concept of its next. This word reflects the idea of group, resolution which will be implemented by several simultaneous spirits. Then I listen with the turn of me, it easy of is not only listened, and a process of distillation this mets on the way all gently in my spirit. I already noticed things very encouraging in future near, there are concepts of awakening of humanity which this make naturally, that reassures me and the desire for a still more open creation gives me. Also if one wants to advance it is necessary to take the time of looked behind is and even if to grant some small installations. My step are still very figurative for the moment, I do not know or will go you it I just make follow a way, which this trace according to my personality and of the community which surrounds me. But for me, it is more obvious than to say to me I want to go over there, in this direction, by this road, with all taken it is not thinkable.
It would be to better want to know me that which conch. And completely unrealistic person. The life as a step of any person is sown obstacles, joys, of discovery, it is that which makes us live. It is the richness of the life. If for us all it would be very traced. It is more than probable we would not exceed the 7 years age. I would say even more than the reason is not existed on ground with all that that implies. Imagined you as with the state of casting. You would not even think they are words this text will not exist. My arts have it to you guess fate of the reflexion of distillation by my spirit as it is specific to each one it is an interpretation which I give, an interpretation of the present at a given moment of the time which passes. Each work is signed temporally seen that it emanates one precise moment of the life it is the expression even of the distillation of the generally accepted idea by my spirits. Then it there with the matter setting, the form, volume, the highlighting; after the analysis it there with the synthetisation. The idea distilled is still worked by the transmission of the movements, of my brain towards my arms. And the matter intervenes an additional factor. I recapitulate my step of creation for you and me in order to highlight this discussion. Of an emanation I distil the perfume, which this models in my thought, my brain synthesizes via my arms which put in volume the cloud of all this reflexion. I pence that this diagram is not mine but that of us all except for some alternatives. I am still fascinated by the representational art surely by make that work is more accessible to me even and the other, a sculpture this sufficed for it even when it is figurative. Make place it in the street, on the window of a store, my desk everyone see and includes/understands that it is a work of art, it that, but with you it is already seen that behind the naive direction of fabric of the sculpture, there is the other message it why of the artist. Pushing this one with creation. The representational art becomes and is much more than one representation, they are representations, it is richer. But then it is not very with make the distillation of listening. It is another interpretation of time a point of view. It is not the gasoline of the moment. What it is the representation, which allows given just idea, which this suffie with it even? I speak and for the moment one listens to me, one hears me, and includes/understands. I continue to speak, of the people leaves me and of other take their place, my discourses with changed, or these people they are tired. But I reassure myself one always listens to me and there there is even more attentive ear. And one even says to me that it is well what I do and it is necessary continued. The interactivity settles, we return in an artistic discussion and my point of view increases bus of people explains me theirs and returns still and still to say to me what likes and appreciates. It is the direction which I want given to my creation, a reflection most exact of our human condition. I start and I already distilled my idea for an abstraction. But instead of last all of continuation from one point to another, I test of given a way so that which conch want to read to include/understand it to me either easier. If I speak it is that I have something to say; It is that I want that one includes/understands me; It is that I want that one answers me. It is that I want shared my ideas and enrichire our ideas with all. It is with water drops that the oceans this form. For me the abstraction, the cubism, the figuration, realism… do not go that one it comes all from the same place, they are reflections of arts through time, art does not cause, art is not declining arts they are the insane ones of the king. It is the man which lives at the period given which creates it according to the inspiration of the moment present. It is the most subversive means to transmit a message, to continue to think of the changes, our world east make to hope and continue to hope that the life is better. For all the alive beings…